Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Mauve rather than coral· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Mauve rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$1.50 less (16%)4.5 (5,856)
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Orange rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Orange rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Red rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Red rather than coral · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than coral· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$3.50 less (37%)4.3 (1,829)
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Same format and precision: retractable· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than coral · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Same format and precision: retractable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
50
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than coral
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than coral· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than coral · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
NARS Long Lasting Matte Lip Liner in Babylon Pink, against Ulta Beauty Collection Automatic Retractable Lip Liner in Petal. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePetalClosest shade matchBabylon PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall80
Colour60%80#f5888a#ea8892Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth20%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableNot listedMatteNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall67
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Smudge and transfer30%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim smudge or transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%85RetractablePencilClosePencil rather than retractable
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 72/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Pillow Talk Fair, against Ulta Beauty Collection Automatic Retractable Lip Liner in Petal. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePetalClosest overall alternativePillow Talk FairHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall80
Colour60%84#f5888a#e5898dClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth20%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Format and precision20%—not comparableRetractableNot listedNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 74/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $3.50 more
CVS
