Automatic Retractable Lip Liner Shimmering Rose dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (1,893)·Rose · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
$4Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.50 less (58%)4.7 (446)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & suitability
50
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sacheu DoubleDown Lip Definer 2-in-1 Liner and Balm in That’s Cute, against Ulta Beauty Collection Automatic Retractable Lip Liner in Shimmering Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShimmering RoseClosest shade matchThat’s CuteHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%87#f68699#ed8f9eVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth20%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableNot listedSatinNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared40
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableRetractableNot listedNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 70/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Long Lasting Matte Lip Liner in Babylon Pink, against Ulta Beauty Collection Automatic Retractable Lip Liner in Shimmering Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShimmering RoseClosest overall alternativeBabylon PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%86#f68699#ea8892Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth20%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableNot listedMatteNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall67
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Smudge and transfer30%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim smudge or transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%85RetractablePencilClosePencil rather than retractable
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 76/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.