24/7 Eyeshadow Fazed dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.3 (828)·Terracotta · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (26%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than terracotta· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: medium terracotta brown matte
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: light brown with cool undertones
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: true tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than terracotta· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedOilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.