24/7 Eyeshadow Lucid dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.3 (828)·Green · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than green
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than green · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (61%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (61%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than green
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than green · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: electric purple teal with green blue shift
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than green· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than green · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: opaque silver with silver pearl
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than green· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than green · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
37
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than green· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than green · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (22%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than green · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: shimmering golden marshmallow
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Filigree, against Urban Decay 24/7 Eyeshadow in Lucid. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLucidClosest shade matchFiligreeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%89#bec9ba#b9c2afVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 67/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Perfect Matcha, against Urban Decay 24/7 Eyeshadow in Lucid. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLucidClosest overall alternativePerfect MatchaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%78#bec9ba#ced6c2Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%82LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.