24/7 Eyeshadow Fix dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.3 (828)·Nude · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: light brown with cool undertones
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than nude· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than nude · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: true tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than nude· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than nude · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: soft tan with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Overall match 67/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Faun, against Urban Decay 24/7 Eyeshadow in Fix. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFixClosest overall alternativeFaunHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%95#c99676#c6977bLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$15 less (65%)
