Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
70
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (76%)4.3 (1,866)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Shimmery Rich Chocolate Brown
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Cream rather than pencil (format and precision)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Pink rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Dior Rouge Dior Contour Lip Liner in 400 Nude Line, against Urban Decay 24/7 Glide-On Waterproof Lip Liner in 1993. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1993Closest shade match400 Nude LineHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%99#905648#8f5547Looks identicalColour difference 0.4 (0 is identical)
Depth20%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall76
Longevity30%6016-hour wear8-hour wearSome difference8-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Smudge and transfer30%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim smudge or transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%100PencilPencilSameBoth pencil
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Iconic Nude, against Urban Decay 24/7 Glide-On Waterproof Lip Liner in 1993. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1993Closest overall alternativeIconic NudeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%88#905648#8d5b4aVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth20%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 86/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraSame price
