Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (76%)4.3 (1,866)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim waterproof· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
91
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light peachy brown & deep warm brown
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (76%)4.3 (1,866)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format and precision: pencil· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (76%)4.5 (66,830)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same format and precision: pencil· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: natural brown with slight pink tones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format and precision: pencil· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$3.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$21.01 less (84%)4.0 (1,970)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format and precision: pencil
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Lancôme Lip Idôle Lip Shaper in 21 Throwing Beige, against Urban Decay 24/7 Glide-On Waterproof Lip Liner in Naked2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNaked2Closest shade match21 Throwing BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall92
Colour60%88#be5d4c#b75d52Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth20%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Format and precision20%100PencilPencilSameBoth pencil
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Too Faced Lip Injection Extreme Lip Shaper Plumping Lip Liner in Hot & Spicy, against Urban Decay 24/7 Glide-On Waterproof Lip Liner in Naked2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNaked2Closest overall alternativeHot & SpicyHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall81
Colour60%76#be5d4c#bb605aClose colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth20%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family10%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall100
Finish100%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared89
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Smudge and transfer30%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim smudge or transfer resistance
Format and precision20%—not comparablePencilNot listedNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 81/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$13 less (52%)
