The Foundation Stick for Hydrating, Buildable Coverage and Natural Finish 29 dupes and alternatives Basma
4.5 (686)·Light · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium to tan complexion with warm golden undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/dry skin
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (38%)5.0 (4)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Luminous rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Luminous finish
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Luminous rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (38%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Described as light medium, yours as medium· Slightly cooler undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Described as light medium, yours as medium · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: light medium with cool pink undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as medium
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Basma The Foundation Stick for Hydrating, Buildable Coverage and Natural Finish 29 (Light · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Hourglass Vanish Seamless Finish Foundation Stick in 12 Warm Honey, against Basma The Foundation Stick for Hydrating, Buildable Coverage and Natural Finish in 29. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade29Closest shade match12 Warm HoneyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#f6bc9e#f9c1a1Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightFairCloseDepth difference: 2.2
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared70
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 88/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ogee Multi-Use Sculpted Foundation and Concealer Stick in Ginkgo 5.00 N, against Basma The Foundation Stick for Hydrating, Buildable Coverage and Natural Finish in 29. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade29Closest overall alternativeGinkgo 5.00 NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#f6bc9e#f6b793Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference: 2.0
Retailer descriptionMediumMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared85
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $2 more
Target
