Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer 450N dupes and alternatives Rare Beauty
4.2 (2,558)·Tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: MD4 - medium-deep to deep with cool undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: MD2.6 - Medium-deep with warm undertones, and an olive tone
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
92
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
92
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Olive rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
25
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
$10.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$13.01 less (54%)4.1 (2,823)
Matches: Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/dry/combination/normal skin
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: D0 - Medium-deep to deep with warm undertones
$10.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$13.01 less (54%)4.1 (2,823)
Matches: Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/dry/combination/normal skin
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (46%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/dry/combination/normal skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: D1 - Medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (46%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer 450N (Tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
L'Oréal Paris True Match Radiant Serum Concealer in N10, against Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 450N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade450NClosest matchN10How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%79#b16e53#ae6f4aClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanDeep tanCloseDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionMedium tanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%—not comparableMediumNot listedNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0Oily, dry, combination, normalSensitiveMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 86/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.