Easy Blur Natural Airbrush Foundation Espresso 600N dupes and alternatives Huda Beauty
4.5 (5,031)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with very warm, rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep rich with neutral undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: rich deep with neutral red undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 32% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: ultra deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep, neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing· Adds SPF 50
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest cool with red undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: coffee - rich brown skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
The closest shade to Huda Beauty Easy Blur Natural Airbrush Foundation Espresso 600N (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Anastasia Beverly Hills Impeccable Blurring Second-Skin Matte Foundation in 10N, against Huda Beauty Easy Blur Natural Airbrush Foundation in Espresso 600N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEspresso 600NClosest shade match10NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#301c1d#28181bVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/oily skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sephora Collection Best Skin Ever Liquid Foundation in 40N, against Huda Beauty Easy Blur Natural Airbrush Foundation in Espresso 600N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEspresso 600NClosest overall alternative40NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%75#301c1d#3f292bClose colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared89
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.