Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
$12.59$17.99Ulta Beauty$24.41 less (66%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$21.01 less (57%)4.1 (9,493)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Huda Beauty Easy Blur Natural Airbrush Foundation Pistachio Cream 425N (Medium · Olive · neutral olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
LYS Beauty Triple Fix Blurring and Hydrating Skin Tint Foundation Stick in TG7, against Huda Beauty Easy Blur Natural Airbrush Foundation in Pistachio Cream 425N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePistachio Cream 425NClosest shade matchTG7How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#d5925e#d18f59Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 1.8
Retailer descriptionTanTanBoth described as tanThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, oilyDry, combination, oilyBoth marketed for dry/oily skin
Overall match 87/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Timeless Hydrating Foundation in 42S Tan Sand, against Huda Beauty Easy Blur Natural Airbrush Foundation in Pistachio Cream 425N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePistachio Cream 425NClosest overall alternative42S Tan SandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%97#d5925e#d8925fLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.5
Retailer descriptionTanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 91/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $18 more
Target
Walmart
