Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than rose· 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$3.01 less (19%)4.4 (49,497)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Other rather than rose· 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Other rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$2.01 less (13%)4.5 (10,199)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than rose· 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$13Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (19%)4.2 (9,047)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than rose· 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than rose· Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than rose · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: For a deep burnt cacao look use
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (31%)4.3 (23,361)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Fenty Beauty Gloss Bomb Stix High-Shine Gloss Stick in Rose Amber, against Sephora Collection Cream Lip Stain 10HR Liquid Lipstick in 119 Bubble Bath. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade119 Bubble BathClosest shade matchRose AmberHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall81
Colour60%93#6e4646#694240Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 2.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 71/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Hazy Matte Lipstick in Chestnut, against Sephora Collection Cream Lip Stain 10HR Liquid Lipstick in 119 Bubble Bath. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade119 Bubble BathClosest overall alternativeChestnutHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall77
Colour60%85#6e4646#704a44Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 83/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $26 more
Walmart
