Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
CoverGirl Clean Fresh Yummy Blur Lipstick in Romance Blur, against Sephora Collection Cream Lip Stain 10HR Liquid Lipstick in 85 Rosewood. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade85 RosewoodClosest shade matchRomance BlurHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%94#9f4d52#a64f55Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%4010-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 77/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Mehr, against Sephora Collection Cream Lip Stain 10HR Liquid Lipstick in 85 Rosewood. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade85 RosewoodClosest overall alternativeMehrHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%91#9f4d52#9a5355Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall100
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall70
Longevity60%9010-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 10-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 92/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.