Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than pink· 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$2.01 less (13%)4.5 (10,199)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than pink· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)· Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Gucci Long Lasting Satin Lipstick in 223 Isabel Rosewood, against Sephora Collection Cream Lip Stain 10HR Liquid Lipstick in 80 Honeymoon. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade80 HoneymoonClosest match223 Isabel RosewoodHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%95#6a3330#65312cLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared78
Finish55%78MatteSatinCloseSatin finish rather than matte
Opacity45%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%7010-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 10-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 87/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $33 more
CVS
