Glidr Eyeshadow Stick ABYSS dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Blue · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: duochrome
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Purple rather than blue · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: vibrant cobalt blue & purple duochrome
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than blue· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Purple rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: medium blue pearl with silver/grey undertones
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
26
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
27
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
27
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (65%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than blue· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
26
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in In The Shadows, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in ABYSS. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeABYSSClosest matchIn The ShadowsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%59#46618f#3560c0Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BlueBlueSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall75
Finish65%76DuochromeMetallicSome differenceMetallic finish rather than duochrome
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall60
Longevity50%8012-hour wear8-hour wearClose8-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.