Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: deep purple shimmer with blue shift
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than purple· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than purple · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than purple · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: metallic vivid violet with a blue duochrome flip
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
about-face Matte Fluid Eye Paint in Morning Glory, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in WISTERIA GLOW. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWISTERIA GLOWClosest shade matchMorning GloryHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall62
Colour60%37#736ba2#795cc8Visibly different colourColour difference 9.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall29
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 51/100Shade match 62/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.