Glidr Eyeshadow Stick MYSTIC dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Rose · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: cool-toned baby pink with silver and pink pinpoints
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: icy silvery baby pink with rainbow glitter
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than rose· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: baby pink with pink & gold glitter
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Metallic · Buildable
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than rose· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than rose · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than rose· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than rose · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer silvery baby pink with silver and pink sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: duochrome
Differences: Lighter· Copper rather than rose· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Copper rather than rose · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than rose· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than rose · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: duochrome· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than rose · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: baby pink with green gold shift
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than rose· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
72
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 37% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Berry Bowl, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in MYSTIC. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMYSTICClosest shade matchBerry BowlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%97#dab9bd#d9bbc0Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Princess Cut, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in MYSTIC. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMYSTICClosest overall alternativePrincess CutHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall74
Colour60%75#dab9bd#deafb5Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 74/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.