Glidr Eyeshadow Stick STAR dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Blue · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Purple rather than blue · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than blue · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than blue· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than blue · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Purple rather than blue · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: smoky steel metallic with gunmetal shimmer/
holographic opal foil with indigo & liliac sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Midnight blue metallic with indigo & baby blue shimmer/Smoky lilac with opal sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than blue· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than blue · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than blue· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than blue · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (56%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: duochrome icy blue with pink reflects
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: icy baby blue with silver and aqua sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than blue· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than blue · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Purple rather than blue · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: duochrome lavender with blue reflects
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than blue· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than blue · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: violet with blue & hot pink pinpoints
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Peekablue Matte, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in STAR. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSTARClosest shade matchPeekablue MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%82#7696be#849fc2Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88MediumLightCloseDepth difference 5.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BlueBlueSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall23
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 63/100Shade match 88/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in Above Santorini, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in STAR. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSTARClosest overall alternativeAbove SantoriniHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%70#7696be#6595b8Close colourColour difference 5.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlueBlueSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall67
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.