Glidr Eyeshadow Stick PETAL dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Pink · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Metallic · Buildable
Differences: Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Green rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Glitter
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: metallic mid-tone pink with gold flecks
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: warm nudie pink with rainbow sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: peach pink with hot pink sparkle
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (41%)4.5 (1,480)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: duochrome· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than pink
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: pinky nude with iridescent pearls
Urban Decay 24/7 Eyeshadow in Bad Seed, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in PETAL. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePETALClosest matchBad SeedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#c87e8f#bf7e8aVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall65
Finish65%61DuochromeShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than duochrome
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.