Glidr Eyeshadow Stick PEARL dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Silver · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: White rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: White rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: White rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: White rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Glitter
Differences: White rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: White rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: White rather than silver· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: White rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer silver with gold and silver sparkle
Differences: White rather than silver· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· White rather than silver· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · White rather than silver · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer silver with gold and silver sparkle
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Deeper· White rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · White rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: White rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: white and gold metallic glitter
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: White rather than silver· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Clinique All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow in Sugar Cane, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in PEARL. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePEARLClosest shade matchSugar CaneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%95#e8ded6#e6dfd9Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared0
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0Normal, CombinationSensitiveDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 76/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rabanne Colorshot Pearly Liquid Eyeshadow in 91 Glow Up, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in PEARL. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePEARLClosest overall alternative91 Glow UpHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%92#e8ded6#f2e7deVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (24%)
Sephora
Walmart