Glidr Eyeshadow Stick LILAC PEARL dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Purple · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than purple· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than purple · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: cool-toned baby pink with silver and pink pinpoints
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than purple· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than purple · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than purple · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than purple· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than purple · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than purple· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than purple · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than purple· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than purple · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than purple · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Midnight blue metallic with indigo & baby blue shimmer/Smoky lilac with opal sparkle
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (56%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Golden rather than purple· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than purple · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne with icy blue sparkle
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Silver rather than purple· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than purple · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than purple· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than purple · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than purple · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: icy silvery baby pink with rainbow glitter
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than purple · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Twilight Mauve/Brandied, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in LILAC PEARL. Matched on the Twilight Mauve pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLILAC PEARLClosest shade matchTwilight Mauve/BrandiedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%97#ceb1bb#ceb3bcLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared0
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0Normal, CombinationSensitiveDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 77/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Winky Lux Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow in Lavender Shimmer, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in LILAC PEARL. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLILAC PEARLClosest overall alternativeLavender ShimmerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%78#ceb1bb#bfacb5Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 4.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall75
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$8 less (24%)
Sephora
