Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: mocha brown with gold and silver pearls
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Kaja Eye Bento Bouncy Eyeshadow Trio in Neutral Moment, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in COCOA DRIP. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCOCOA DRIPClosest shade matchNeutral MomentHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#81665d#826559Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Bite Size Eyeshadow Palette in Cold Brew, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in COCOA DRIP. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCOCOA DRIPClosest overall alternativeCold BrewHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%98#81665d#81675fLooks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.