Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (56%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Metallic · Buildable
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Sacheu Long Wear Liquid Eyeshadow STAY-N in Candy Dipp’d, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in CHAMPAGNE ICE. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCHAMPAGNE ICEClosest shade matchCandy Dipp’dHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#d8b3a9#d7ada0Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared63
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Moonstone, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in CHAMPAGNE ICE. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCHAMPAGNE ICEClosest overall alternativeMoonstoneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#d8b3a9#d5b4a5Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall50
Longevity50%3512-hour wear24-hour wearDifferent24-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared87
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%87Normal, CombinationNormal, Dry, CombinationCloseBoth marketed for normal, combination skin
Overall match 87/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$12 less (35%)
