Glidr Eyeshadow Stick GREYSTONE dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Grey · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Taupe rather than grey· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than grey · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than grey· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than grey · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than grey· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than grey · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than grey · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than grey· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than grey · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
72
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than grey · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than grey· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than grey · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than grey· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than grey · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Taupe rather than grey· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than grey · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than grey · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than grey· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than grey · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Make Up For Ever Aqua Resist Smoky Eyeshadow Stick in 13 Cinder, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in GREYSTONE. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGREYSTONEClosest shade match13 CinderHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%83#8e7771#8e7367Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreyGreySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall48
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared87
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%87Normal, CombinationNormal, Dry, CombinationCloseBoth marketed for normal, combination skin
Overall match 73/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Smashbox Always On Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Stone Fox, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in GREYSTONE. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGREYSTONEClosest overall alternativeStone FoxHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%59#8e7771#827378Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreyGreySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall91
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.