Glidr Eyeshadow Stick GLEAMWOOD dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Brown · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: deep brown with multi colored shimmer
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: modern beige, java jazz, & cocoa dip
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Patrick Ta Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo in Still At The Club, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in GLEAMWOOD. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGLEAMWOODClosest shade matchStill At The ClubHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%77#845a5b#7e5f5cClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall81
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Canyon, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in GLEAMWOOD. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGLEAMWOODClosest overall alternativeCanyonHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%64#845a5b#7a4a48Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%76Deep / darkDeep / darkSome differenceDepth difference 8.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.