Glidr Eyeshadow Stick AMETHYST dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Black · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Purple rather than black· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than black · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: glitter
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than black· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than black · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: metallic eggplant with navy flecks
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than black
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than black · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: black with black and silver shimmer
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Purple rather than black· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Purple rather than black · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Grey rather than black
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Grey rather than black · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Blue rather than black
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Blue rather than black · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than black
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than black · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a clean deep dark chocolate brown
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Matte rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: matte deep grey with cool undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Berry rather than black
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Berry rather than black · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Morphe ChromaPlus 12-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Flickering Sands, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in AMETHYST. Matched on pan 12. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAMETHYSTClosest shade matchFlickering SandsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour60%62#473d4e#493f44Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlackBlackSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall25
Finish65%0GlitterMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glitter
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 59/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Tourmaline Dream, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in AMETHYST. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAMETHYSTClosest overall alternativeTourmaline DreamHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour60%52#473d4e#3e414eSlight colour differenceColour difference 7.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlackBlackSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall50
Longevity50%3512-hour wear24-hour wearDifferent24-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%50Normal, CombinationNormalSome differenceBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 69/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.