Glidr Eyeshadow Stick DUSTY ROSE dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Rose · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Plum rather than rose· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than rose · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than rose· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than rose · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Taupe rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Taupe rather than rose · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: warm nudie pink with rainbow sparkle
Alleyoop 11th Hour Cream Eyeshadow & Liner Stick in Making Mauves, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in DUSTY ROSE. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDUSTY ROSEClosest matchMaking MauvesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%93#a16f74#a06a6fVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.