Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: soft tan with cool undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Grey rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than golden· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than golden · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Satin rather than matte (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Satin rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Kaja Eye Bento Bouncy Eyeshadow Trio in Neutral Moment, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in SOFT OCHRE. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSOFT OCHREClosest shade matchNeutral MomentHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%78#b69482#b29278Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 61/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
florence by mills Eye Candy Eyeshadow Stick in Sugar Coat, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in SOFT OCHRE. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSOFT OCHREClosest overall alternativeSugar CoatHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%75#b69482#ba987cClose colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.