Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
86
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than brown· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than brown · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Grey rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Kaja Eye Bento Bouncy Eyeshadow Trio in Velvet Dream, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in BRANDY FLAME. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBRANDY FLAMEClosest shade matchVelvet DreamHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#a47368#a67061Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Rustique, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in BRANDY FLAME. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBRANDY FLAMEClosest overall alternativeRustiqueHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%80#a47368#a76a5eClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 82/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraSame price
