Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: glitter
Differences: Deeper· Plum rather than black· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Plum rather than black · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: metallic eggplant with navy flecks
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
44
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than black· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than black · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a clean deep dark chocolate brown
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Grey rather than black
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Grey rather than black · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm taupe / a shimmering blackened green
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than black· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than black · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Grey rather than black
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Grey rather than black · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Grey rather than black
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Grey rather than black · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: black with black and silver shimmer
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Grey rather than black· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than black · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Onyx, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in GRAPHITE GLOW. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGRAPHITE GLOWClosest matchOnyxHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#4d4f53#4e5458Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlackBlackSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Same price
Sephora
