Glidr Eyeshadow Stick BLUE ICE dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Blue · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone
Differences: White rather than blue· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: White rather than blue· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: White rather than blue· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 70% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Silver rather than blue· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than blue · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer silver with gold and silver sparkle
Differences: White rather than blue· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (47%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: shimmering golden marshmallow
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: White rather than blue· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than blue· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than blue · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Silver rather than blue· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Silver rather than blue · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer silver with gold and silver sparkle
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than blue· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than blue · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: white and gold metallic glitter
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than blue· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than blue · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: White rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: White rather than blue· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· White rather than blue· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · White rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than blue · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than blue· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than blue · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: White rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: White rather than blue· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than blue · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: duochrome
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than blue· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than blue · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: opalescent white w/pink, violet & blue duochrome effects
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: White rather than blue· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
ColourPop Jelly Much Gel Eyeshadow Stick in Diamond Girl, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in BLUE ICE. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBLUE ICEClosest matchDiamond GirlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%81#e1dbd4#ece3e0Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlueBlueSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall96
Finish65%94DuochromeGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than duochrome
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.