Glidr Eyeshadow Stick SIRENA dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (1,289)·Green · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than green· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than green · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than green· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than green · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Dark olive metallic with taupe shimmer/Sage green foil with champagne sparkle
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
44
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than normal, combination (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
26
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than green
Score details
Shade match
19
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than green · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
25
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: electric purple teal with green blue shift
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than green· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
15
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than green · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matte · Buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in All About the Benjamins, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in SIRENA. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSIRENAClosest shade matchAll About the BenjaminsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall49
Colour60%19#3c8d9f#5b7d75Visibly different colourColour difference 12.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%81MediumMediumSome differenceDepth difference 7.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall67
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 61/100Shade match 49/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$5 less (15%)
