Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Earthy Glam (taupe beige glitter), Wood Breeze (olive beige brown shimmer), Night Haze (deep khaki brown matte)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$25.01 less (64%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than rose· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than rose · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$34Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (13%)4.5 (4,815)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.5 (1,590)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Peach rather than rose· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than rose · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than rose· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than rose · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Nude Mood, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 11S Bronze. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11S BronzeClosest shade matchNude MoodHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%84#c59c8a#c8988aClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall29
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%20LiquidPaletteDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 64/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Liquid Shadow in Shadow Starstruck, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 11S Bronze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11S BronzeClosest overall alternativeShadow StarstruckHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%95#c59c8a#ca9f8eLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$3 less (8%)
