Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (56%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than mauve· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than mauve · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: bonne chance/khaki green, bisou/golden peach, frappé/mink brown
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than mauve· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than mauve · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$23Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (41%)4.3 (828)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than mauve· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than mauve · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$30 less (77%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than mauve· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than mauve · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
36
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Patrick Ta Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo in Slow Burn, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 80M Mauve. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade80M MauveClosest shade matchSlow BurnHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%97#daaaa2#d9a9a3Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 63/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Shadowstix Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Fizzy Frosé, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 80M Mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade80M MauveClosest overall alternativeFizzy FroséHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%94#daaaa2#dea99eVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 80/100Shade match 82/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (56%)
