Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.5 (1,590)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (69%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (33%)4.7 (1,256)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: champagne gold that reflects pink
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than rose· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than rose · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims waterproof
Differences: Peach rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Ballet Blush, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 40S tearose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade40S tearoseClosest shade matchBallet BlushHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%92#e7b199#dfab91Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall87
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 90/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Silk Armour, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 40S tearose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade40S tearoseClosest overall alternativeSilk ArmourHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#e7b199#e4af9dVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 93/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.