Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$30 less (77%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than nude· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than nude · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: bonne chance/khaki green, bisou/golden peach, frappé/mink brown
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (56%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (33%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$23Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (41%)4.3 (828)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Nude Mood, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 18M Beige. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade18M BeigeClosest shade matchNude MoodHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#e9bbab#e9baa7Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall81
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%20LiquidPaletteDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Violette_Fr YEUX PAINT Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in Petite Culotte, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 18M Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade18M BeigeClosest overall alternativePetite CulotteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%75#e9bbab#d9ad99Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%79LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 7.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 86/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$23 less (59%)
