Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (36%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sheer gold with multi-color sparkle
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: pale neutral with a silvery gold sparkle
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (69%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: champagne with silver & gold flecks
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Need It Nude, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 67S Sparkle. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade67S SparkleClosest shade matchNeed It NudeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#dab49d#dbb5a0Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall29
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%20LiquidPaletteDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 69/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Starlight Shimmer, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 67S Sparkle. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade67S SparkleClosest overall alternativeStarlight ShimmerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#dab49d#ddbca3Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Overall match 92/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$26.01 less (67%)
Sephora
