Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (56%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: light brown with cool undertones
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: soft tan with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
36
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Bobbi Brown Dual-Ended Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Heat Ray / Biscotti, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 22M Cashew. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade22M CashewClosest shade matchHeat Ray / BiscottiHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#cb957e#c79884Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumLightCloseDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall30
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 70/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Panna Cotta, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 22M Cashew. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade22M CashewClosest overall alternativePanna CottaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%89#cb957e#ca9b88Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumLightCloseDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$5 less (13%)
