Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow 30M Cedar dupes and alternatives Armani Beauty
4.4 (2,526)·Taupe · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: light brown with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: soft tan with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Grey rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (56%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Contour in Mellow, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 30M Cedar. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade30M CedarClosest matchMellowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%96#c2957d#c1977eLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumLightCloseDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$14 less (36%)
