Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Copper rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (69%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$28.50 less (73%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$34Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (13%)4.5 (4,815)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Bare & Brave, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 44S Blush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade44S BlushClosest shade matchBare & BraveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#c28c7d#bc8c80Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall40
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Wild Rose, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 44S Blush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade44S BlushClosest overall alternativeWild RoseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#c28c7d#c28f86Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall85
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$22 less (56%)
