Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$30 less (77%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: true tan with neutral undertones
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than nude· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than nude · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
30
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.5 (1,590)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than nude· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than nude · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
0
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Everything Is Sunshine, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 25M Sandalwood. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade25M SandalwoodClosest shade matchEverything Is SunshineHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#d8a588#d1a28dVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormalNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 68/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Violette_Fr YEUX PAINT Liquid Eyeshadow & Eyeliner in Petite Culotte, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 25M Sandalwood. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade25M SandalwoodClosest overall alternativePetite CulotteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%79#d8a588#d9ad99Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 89/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$17 less (44%)
