Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (49%)4.5 (1,480)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$34Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (13%)4.5 (4,815)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Copper rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sparkling pink with multi-colored pearl
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$28.50 less (73%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Copper rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Hypebiscus, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 27S peony. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade27S peonyClosest shade matchHypebiscusHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#c1837e#c8837cVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall60
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Blush, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 27S peony. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade27S peonyClosest overall alternativeBlushHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#c1837e#bd7d75Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall87
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 90/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$28.50 less (73%)
