Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow dupes and alternatives Armani Beauty
4.4 (2,526)·Bronze · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (49%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$46 less (84%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$35 less (64%)4.5 (1,480)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Copper rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Copper rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
30
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
DIBS Beauty Duet Baked Bronzer in Spiced Chai, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in Single shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSingle shadeClosest shade matchSpiced ChaiHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#af7b65#b4795dVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared44
Finish65%50MatteDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Noble, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in Single shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSingle shadeClosest overall alternativeNobleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%88#af7b65#a97a60Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$31 less (56%)
