Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow 20S rose dupes and alternatives Armani Beauty
4.4 (2,526)·Rose · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (69%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$25.01 less (64%)4.4 (1,922)
Metallic
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.5 (1,590)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in So Bright Now, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 20S rose. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade20S roseClosest shade matchSo Bright NowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#d49380#d39586Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall29
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%20LiquidPaletteDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 68/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Glimmer Rose, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 20S rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade20S roseClosest overall alternativeGlimmer RoseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#d49380#e0967fVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall82
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.