Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$27.01 less (69%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.5 (1,590)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Earthy Glam (taupe beige glitter), Wood Breeze (olive beige brown shimmer), Night Haze (deep khaki brown matte)
$34Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (13%)4.5 (4,815)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than brown · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.5 (1,590)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than brown· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than brown · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Faun, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 68S Tobacco. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade68S TobaccoClosest shade matchFaunHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%84#d09f87#c6977bClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightLightSameDepth difference 4.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared25
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall78
Longevity50%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 66/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Liquid Shadow in Shadow Starstruck, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 68S Tobacco. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade68S TobaccoClosest overall alternativeShadow StarstruckHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%87#d09f87#ca9f8eVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$11 less (28%)
