Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than green
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than green · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (33%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (33%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than green· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than green · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: an olive green with silver shimmer
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than green· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than green · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than green· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than green · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sage green with silver pearls
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Metallic rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than green· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than green · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than green· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than green · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than green · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (62%)4.0 (271)
Metallic · Opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than green· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than green · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than green
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than green · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than green· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than green · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Queen Olive, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 90M Olive. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade90M OliveClosest shade matchQueen OliveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%77#96825f#8a7856Close colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86MediumMediumSameDepth difference 5.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared13
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall58
Longevity50%7516-hour wear11-hour wearSome difference11-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 58/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Danessa Myricks Beauty Twin Flames Liquid Eyeshadow in Sweetheart, against Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 90M Olive. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade90M OliveClosest overall alternativeSweetheartHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%67#96825f#947c64Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall28
Finish65%0MatteDuochromeDifferentDuochrome finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 62/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$9 less (23%)
