Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation 166N dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.6 (4,140)·Light medium · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
90
Looks identical · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: for light to light-medium skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: light to medium with neutral olive tones
$45Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (6%)4.0 (3,494)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for light neutral skin with a peach hue
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same natural finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for light to medium skin with warm neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$29.01 less (60%)4.2 (18,317)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same natural finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$34 less (71%)3.5 (10)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: fair or light skin tones with a neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same natural finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: natural beige shade with neutral undertones
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$34.01 less (71%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
90
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: light with cool pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
30
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation 166N (Light medium · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Milani Conceal + Perfect 2-in-1 Foundation in Medium Beige, against Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 166N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade166NClosest shade matchMedium BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#e0af8c#dfae8bLooks identicalColour difference 0.3 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared54
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, combination, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Too Faced Born This Way Undetectable Medium-To-Full Coverage Foundation in Porcelain, against Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 166N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade166NClosest overall alternativePorcelainHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%95#e0af8c#e6af8aLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall91
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall30
Skin type100%30Normal, combination, oilyNormal, dryBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 91/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (15%)
