Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation 576W dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.6 (4,140)·Rich deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep rich with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 37% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$29.01 less (60%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: D8 - very rich deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: coffee - rich brown skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for very rich, deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep rich with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: D7 - very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: rich deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
30
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: rich deep with neutral golden undertones
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$34 less (71%)4.1 (33)
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: D8 - very deep with cool undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Ultra Rich skin with neutral-olive undertones
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
91
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: very rich with neutral undertones
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (27%)4.5 (732)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
33
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: very rich with neutral, slightly red undertones
$18.49Ulta Beauty(product price)$29.51 less (61%)4.3 (1,381)
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: rich with cool neutral undertone
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (27%)4.5 (732)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: rich with neutral warm undertones
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation 576W (Rich deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
ILIA Skin Rewind Blurring Foundation and Concealer Complexion Stick in 41W Cocobolo, against Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 576W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade576WClosest shade match41W CocoboloHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#4b2d1e#4c3024Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, combination, oilyNormal, combination, sensitiveBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation in 495, against Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 576W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade576WClosest overall alternative495How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#4b2d1e#4e2919Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall70
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, combination, oilyNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 86/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $1 more
