Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation 476N dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.6 (4,140)·Very deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$32.01 less (67%)4.1 (9,493)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$29.01 less (60%)4.4 (40,035)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$34.01 less (71%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No long-wear claim· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 27% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (40%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: Tan/Deep with Warm Undertones
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$34 less (71%)4.1 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
75
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
67
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
$42Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (13%)4.4 (2,174)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
79
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Luminous rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Luminous rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$14.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$33.50 less (70%)4.5 (995)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$32.01 less (67%)4.2 (324)
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$8.75Ulta Beauty(product price)$39.25 less (82%)5.0 (3)
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation 476N (Very deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 205 Tanzania, against Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 476N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade476NClosest shade match205 TanzaniaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#734525#784421Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Smashbox Always On Skin-Balancing Foundation in T20N, against Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r Fluid Flex Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 476N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade476NClosest overall alternativeT20NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%88#734525#7b4c2eVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91Very deepDeepCloseDepth difference: 4.3
Retailer descriptionMedium tanTanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 86/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.