Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Amethyst dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Mauve · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: brown pearl with subtle pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than mauve· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than mauve · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than mauve· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than mauve · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Purple rather than mauve· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (24%)4.7 (163)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· 10-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · 10-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than mauve· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than mauve · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering taupe with silver, pink & gold sparkle / a neutral taupe
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than mauve· Dewy rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than mauve · Dewy rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than mauve · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: medium mauve w/ pink micro glitter
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Grey rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Grey rather than mauve · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than mauve · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: metallic copper brown with silver reflects
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Purple rather than mauve· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Purple rather than mauve · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Spirit, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Amethyst. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmethystClosest matchSpiritHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#957072#967171Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall48
Longevity50%3124-hour wear11-hour wearDifferent11-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.